26 April 2010

Shawn the Baptist




Below this comment you can read the entire article, or jump to it here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262310/Gay-rights-campaigner-condemns-1-000-fine-preacher-said-homosexuality-sin.html

But for now, let's just say that "Freedom of Speech" got hit with a massive blow in Glasgow, Scotland last month. Seems an American Baptist, Shawn Holes, who is pictured with the Bible in hand, was answering questions at a public forum and said, matter-of-factly that homosexuals are going to hell. He also said that Mohammed was a sinner "just like the rest of us."

Under the Criminal Justice Act, he was arrested and given a 1000 pound penalty (Aussie $1660). Wow, a massive penalty for conversational question and answers. He was charged with "uttering homophobic remarks" in a breach of the peace that prosecutors said was "aggravated by religious prejudice."

I'm all for police and the courts keeping the peace. I'm all for people not being allowed to incite to violence. At the same time, freedom of speech must be safeguarded or you will have thought police monitoring all our conversations, emails and public speeches. That's not right.

Even Peter Tatchell, a gay rights activist (also pictured above), said, "The price of freedom of speech is that we sometimes have to put up with opinions that are objectionable and offensive."

Goodonya Peter. Not for your views on homosexuality, but for your giving people a "fair go." That's the Aussie way (even though you are a Scot). A person with convictions is open to contrary views and welcomes good debate and conversation.

What about you? Are you open-minded? Do you have alternate opinions about God, Jesus, religion, atheism, etc? If so, you should be willing to discuss this and other matters. In a forum especially!

Shawn the Baptist (as he self-identifies) from upstate New York, is one we are highlighting, but this could be a conversation starter in your house today.

What do you think about Jesus?

Happy Anzac Day (celebrated) weekend.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262310/Gay-rights-campaigner-condemns-1-000-fine-preacher-said-homosexuality-sin.html#ixzz0m9insbx7


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262310/Gay-rights-campaigner-condemns-1-000-fine-preacher-said-homosexuality-sin.html#ixzz0m9iF75hV




Here's the full article:
Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell defends 'homosexuals are sinners' preacher and slams £1,000 fine as heavy-handed

By Arthur Martin
Last updated at 8:45 PM on 30th March 2010

Gay rights campaigner Peter Tatchell has defended a Christian street preacher fined £1,000 for saying that homosexuality is a sin.

Baptist Shawn Holes was taken from a busy shopping street in a police van and locked in a cell for the night.

He appeared in court the next day charged with 'uttering homophobic remarks' in a breach of the peace that prosecutors said was 'aggravated by religious prejudice'.
Peter Tatchell
Shawn David Holes

Campaigner Peter Tatchell (left) has defended Christian street preacher Shawn Holes (right), who was fined £1,000 for saying that homosexuality is a sin

Last night Mr Tatchell attacked the fine as 'heavy-handed' and 'totally disproportionate'.

He said: 'The price of freedom of speech is that we sometimes have to put up with opinions that are objectionable and offensive.

'Just as people should have the right to criticise religion, people of faith should have the right to criticise homosexuality. Only incitements to violence should be illegal.'

Mr Holes, an American preacher who was travelling around Britain with a dozen colleagues, was arrested in Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, on March 18.

After discussing general Christian topics, the married father-of-two, a former wedding photographer, was fielding questions from the crowd.

When asked about his views on gays, Mr Holes, 47, from Lake Placid in New York State, said he told questioners: 'Homosexuals deserve the wrath of God - and so do all other sinners - and they are going to a place called Hell.'

He also said he told listeners, when asked for his views on Islam, that he believed there is only one true Christian God and he believed the Prophet Mohammed is a 'sinner like the rest of us'.

Mr Holes added: 'Two men who were listening went over to a couple of police officers and they came over and told me, "These people say you said homos are going to Hell". I told them I would never say that, because I don't use the term homo. But I was arrested.'

Mr Holes appeared before Sheriff Rita Rae on March 19, charged under the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003.

Although he denied criminality, Mr Holes said he felt he had no choice but to plead guilty.

He explained: 'I am not a rich man and was due to fly back to the U.S. where my father is seriously ill.'

Christians in the Glasgow area helped Mr Holes, now back in the U.S., pay the fine.

A spokesman for the Crown Office - the Scottish prosecution service - said: 'We take all crimes of prejudice extremely seriously.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262310/Gay-rights-campaigner-condemns-1-000-fine-preacher-said-homosexuality-sin.html#ixzz0m9gb7oTO

24 April 2010

Sermons online

iTunes is an easy way to Podcast and we have begun doing so..

Studies in the Book of Acts:
Book of Acts, Part I

Sermons from various topics:
Various sermons

We plan to be putting up more and more over the weeks, so please keep searching iTunes or write back on Blogger here for more information.

Thanks for 'following' us.

19 April 2010

Here comes the judge


According to the New York Times today, "Richard Goldstone, one of South Africa's most eminent jurists and head of a United Nations investigation that said it found evidence of war crimes during Israel’s invasion of Gaza. Many of his countrymen not only took issue with the findings, they called the judge a traitor who had sold out his Jewish brethren.

"Next month, Judge Goldstone’s grandson is to celebrate his bar mitzvah at Beth Hamedrash Hagadol, an Orthodox synagogue in Sandton, a Johannesburg suburb. Ordinarily, this would be nothing but a joyous event, signifying the boy’s ascent into manhood. But Jewish leaders here recently began to speak darkly among themselves of threatened disruptions to the ceremony. Their concerns were taken to the synagogue, and the anxieties of its leadership were then shared with the family.

"In an e-mail message on Friday, Judge Goldstone, who is a visiting professor at Georgetown University Law Center, said, ‘Because of the threat of protests at my grandson’s bar mitzvah, I agreed in discussion with leaders of the Sandton synagogue that in the interests of my grandson, I would not attend the services.’ "

Years from now, when the Bar Mitzvah boy is long a man, he will want to have a look at his photos and other mementos of the day. He will share those photos and those memories with his wife and children, the great grandchildren of Judge Goldstone. And missing will be the judge. And that's something that should not be. Blood is thicker than international issues, don't you reckon?

The Times report continues, “The South African Zionist Federation has been among the most vocal critics of the so-called Goldstone Report on the war in Gaza. On Friday, Moonyeen Castle, the chairwoman of the organization’s Western Cape Council, said the anger at Judge Goldstone was so great that it would “result in an almost certain barrage of protesters” on the day of the celebration.”

My own family did not attend my wedding some 33 years ago. And throughout the decades, one by one, different members of the family told me of their regrets for missing that occasion. Why had they not attended? Religious differences were the only factor. I'm a Jew who is also a follower of Jesus. That sat poorly with my orthodox Jewish family and as a result, they boycotted the festive celebration. That was a pain then, and is today when I really think about it.

I wish only the best for the Goldstone family and all at the shule in Sandton. Regrets will certainly come down the road. I say, ‘let him attend.’ I say, tell the protesters to find another occasion or another venue to protest. They will certainly be Jewish people and they will certainly know the respect due the grandson and to his becoming a man that morning. Let the judge attend!

13 April 2010

iTunes sermons and classes

Shalom friends, a new link.

Click on iTunes Sermons

We are putting up new and old, sermons and Bible classes for those who use iTunes as an application and want to download podcasts in that way. Hope you enjoy them. Shalom.

11 April 2010

Bob's story: How did an Orthodox Jew become a follower of Jesus?

Bob Mendelsohn: My story


I don’t think I had ever been so nervous. My mouth was terribly dry, yet the palms of my hands were puddled with sweat. I had studied intensely for a whole year to prepare me for these next few hours. Would I stumble over the Hebrew I had studied so carefully? Would I remember my speech, the only part of my bar mitzvah I was to present in English?

I was about to become a “son of the commandment” through the ceremony that initiates a 13-year-old boy into the religious life of the Jewish community! I would be responsible to obey the Torah and all its accompanying codes of oral tradition. Quite a heavy responsibility for one who, in many ways, was still a child.

The rabbi called me forward to lead the shacharit, the morning service. I faced a frightening sea of faces. I imagined each person with a clipboard, waiting to evaluate my performance and turn in a score to some panel of judges. Not that there were any such clipboards or judges, but I was greatly concerned with doing well to please and impress everyone who had come to hear me.

Latecomers trickled in and the 1000 seat sanctuary was filling up quickly. Reassuring smiles of friends and relatives helped. Even my Spanish teacher from school was there, along with the third-baseman for the Kansas City Athletics.

It was time to start. After a few minutes of canting the familiar melodies, my nervousness dissolved.

The Torah scroll, in its beautiful velvet cover, was removed from the ark. I led the congregation in the Sh’ma, “Hear, O Israel, the LORD our God, the LORD is one.” I reverently carried the Torah around the sanctuary for all the people to see and kiss.
Back on the bimah, my Torah reading went well. I felt happy to have some of my relatives up there with me, especially when it was my father’s turn to recite one of the seven benedictions. I relaxed a bit more as I sang my Scripture portions; I chanted the musaf for the Sabbath. Then it was over and I sat down.

Afterwards, there was plenty of food and drink and merry-making. People congratulated me and wished me great success in the future. I felt good. It was over and I had done well; I could relax and enjoy being the guest of honor.

I was born in 1951 in Kansas City, Missouri, at Menorah Hospital.

My father, Elic, was born in Kansas City in 1921. His parents came over from Russia/Poland. Dad grew up to be a salesman—not of one particular item, but of many. He knew how to make people want what he was selling. He sold many products: stuffed toys, Papercraft Paper, or Niles and Moser Cigars—even Nelson Bibles for a time.

My mother, Helen (nee) Wolf, was born in 1922 in Kansas City. She and my father met on Yom Kippur in 1937. It was downstairs in the social hall of the synagogue, during services. My dad struck up a conversation with her using a line that could have been right out of a Gene Kelly movie. He snapped his fingers near her face, she turned, and he said, “Thanks. I wanted to see the face that went with those legs.” Dad was Orthodox and Mom usually attended a Reform temple. However, to honor the family on the High Holidays, she and her mother always went to the Orthodox shul along with Mom’s maternal grandmother. They all sat upstairs with the other women, but now and then, my mother went downstairs where the teens socialized.

Mom and Dad married in June, 1942. Dad served in the Navy in World War II. He was in Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 on the USS Wharton, rescuing women and children and delivering them to safety after the attack. Later he served in Europe (Italy, Southern France) and Northern Africa, as well as Alaska and the islands of Macon and Tarawa. Finally, in 1945 he was stationed in Norfolk, Virginia, which is where he and my mother were living when my brother Michael was born that same year.

Michael was a salesman too; he worked with my dad for years. Now he is a pasta maker for an Italian restaurant in Kansas City. My sister Judy, born in 1948, also lives in KC and sells advertising for the Kansas City weekly Jewish newspaper. She also works at the Welcome Center at Hallmark Cards.

I’m the baby, born in 1951. And I am a missionary. So how did that happen? After all, I always took my Judaism very seriously.
Being Jewish was always a fact of life for me. My mother worked at the synagogue in the office, taught kindergarten in the Sunday school, coached our synagogue youth group’s musicals and dramas and was president of the Marcella Rodin Auxilliary for volunteers.
Attending synagogue, celebrating holidays at home—this was the norm as far back as I can remember. I bowled with Jewish kids, played basketball with Jewish friends and learned about our people in Hebrew school. I never questioned my Jewish identity. The culinary side of that identity was nurtured by regular visits to both our grandmothers’ houses. My dad’s mom, Bubbe, used to make her own ground horseradish and pickles—the latter she kept in brine out on her porch. Bubbe also made delicious apple strudel. My mother’s mom, Grandma Bessie, was not so “old world” but still, she was definitively Jewish. I don’t remember her cooking so many traditional dishes, but she loved to feed us and always brought banana cream pies to family dinners.
But being Jewish was more than a familial identity for me. It was a calling.

Whereas some boys tolerated Hebrew school, I was devout. Part of my devotion, I suppose, was due to the fact that I could excel. Cognitive learning (handling facts/figures) always came easily to me. Much of Hebrew school was a test of cognitive skills, so I did well. Doing well mattered to me, and in Judaism I found my niche. Encouragement from the rabbis was also key. I wanted their approval and they bestowed it generously.
I was recognized as a spiritual leader in my youth group and during the afternoons, when I went to Hebrew school, I led the Minchah and Ma’ariv services.
I was bar mitzvah in 1964 and finished Hebrew school in 1966 (my graduation photo to the right). I was very involved in our youth group, SYO (Synagogue Youth Organization). SYO was a Midwest regional subsidiary of the National Conference of Synagogue Youth (NCSY), the Orthodox youth movement. I was the local vice president, editor of our paper and member of the regional planning committee for conferences.
In 1966, the national organization of Boy Scouts was looking for a good Jewish experience to report for their magazine and someone at my synagogue suggested me. I guess I was the all-American Midwestern Jew—the magazine published an article about me with photos, which added to my high profile in our community.
I conducted the morning prayer services on special Shabbats. I davened quickly and got better and faster as I grew. When I led the Shabbat services, there would have been upwards of 300 people. Feelings? Pride that I could do so well. Spiritual thoughts? None . . .
My prayers were institutional. Yes, I believed that God was a wonderful Being. I believed he was real because that’s what we (Jewish people) believe. That was all I knew. God was not knowable. He was not personal. He just was. I gave up talking to God early on, having noticed that the few prayers I offered up never came to pass. Maybe, I thought, God had not answered in a personal way because so many people were talking to him about so much all the time. Maybe he took our prayers under advisement. In any case, I grew up with the motto, Qué será, será, what will be will be, and don’t expect God to do much about it. Though I didn’t talk much to God, I did talk with others about him—and concluded that God was big and important and well, Other. And there was something of that mystique to the religion of Judaism.
Even though I was officially a “son of the commandment” (the Law) at 13, it was not until three years later that I became serious about observing it.
It was summer. I went to youth camp in Wild Rose, Wisconsin and there encountered Jimmy. He was a man from New York City, a baal teshuva who came to work as a volunteer at Camp Moshava. He confronted me with my compromises and challenged me to live a more orthopractic life. I had always been proud to be Jewish. There was some mystique to all these dos and don’ts that were supposed to improve me as a person and, in particular, as a Jew. The fact that my parents were less observant than I felt they should have been made it all the more attractive. Sixteen-year-olds generally feel they know more than their parents, and here was an opportunity for me to be different from them and have something of my own while intensifying something that had always been important to me—my Jewishness. So I returned from camp very enthused about my religion.
I was fervent, not so much about God, but about “doing” Judaism correctly. Indirectly, my observance was connected to God since I was fairly certain that he existed, and that he had commanded us Jews to do certain mitzvot. It was my job, as a Jew, to observe these commands and comply. I figured that even if there were no God, it couldn’t hurt to comply. And because compromise was a very bad word in my youthful understandings, and because I saw only absolutes, I stopped eating out with my parents and stopped attending their synagogue. I couldn’t eat kosher food at home and non-kosher food when we went out. I couldn’t drive to synagogue and park a block away and pretend to walk. I walked all the way to a different, closer synagogue, Ohev Yisrael. As far as I was concerned, my devotion had to be 100%-or nothing.

When I went to university (Washington University in St. Louis), I found a way to continue my Jewish education: I gave the rabbi’s son guitar lessons in exchange for lessons in religion from his father (Rabbi Polin). I enjoyed persuading others to be more frum as well, bringing friends with me to learn from the rabbi. Several of us laid tefillin each morning.

My concept of God didn’t change, but my understanding of his demands on our lives did. God still was big and other, but now I felt like I was keeping more of the rules. Observance tends to make one feel holier.

Yet hard as I tried, I always seemed to fall short; there was always something more to do, or not do. My efforts never seemed good enough. There was always something missing in my efforts to please God. He seemed so insatiable. The road to being a good Jew was very long and seemed to be lined with more books than the shelves at the 42nd Street Library could hold. The ruach (spirit) we longed to experience in the songfests was never quite enough to fill us (although it did exhaust us). Nothing was ever enough. There was always more learning, more kavanah (devotion), more attention to minutiae, more people to bring in, more kindnesses to extend, more stories to memorize.
One Friday night, I had an experience that may seem silly or small but it was the beginning of a great change. I had attended the erev Shabbat services at Tiferes Israel- Chevra Kadisha in University City (the Delmar Loop) suburban St. Louis. The rabbi had been teaching me personally for months. It was an enjoyable night with good conversation and personal attention from the rabbi. But when I came home, I had a problem. My Shabbes goy (the gentile who took care of details I couldn’t attend to during the 25 hours of Sabbath—like turning my lights on and off) was gone. He had left for a party—and had left me in the proverbial lurch. There I was in Eliot Hall, the men’s high rise (which has long since gone co-ed), and the bright overhead light was shining in my face as I lay down for the night. I said my prayers. I almost asked God to bring along Rick or even Mike or Chuck or one of the other Jewish students in our dorm who were not as observant and might have turned off the light for me. But I didn’t ask, and as a religious Jew I could not ignite or shut it off according to the rabbinic interpretation of the Scripture. What a dilemma. What was I to do?

After about 30 minutes of arguing with God “Tevye-style” (remember Fiddler on the Roof?), I got up and shut off the light. I felt horrible. I’d just broken a commandment—on purpose! How could I go to synagogue the next day without feeling like a hypocrite?
I didn’t go back to services the next morning; I felt too guilty. The rabbi called a few days later to inquire after me. I told him some things were changing and I wouldn’t be back for a while. He didn’t know my shame. I couldn’t disclose these things to him. What would he think of me if I did?

My disillusionment with myself eventually evolved into a disillusionment with “the system.” School and religion—arenas which had once been a source for much of my self esteem—lost their luster.

I dropped out of university in December 1970. I became a hippie and a wandering Jew, hoping to find some peace and meaning for my life. I hitchhiked to New Orleans, Louisiana and on to Atlanta, Georgia. I stayed at Emory University with some people I had met on the streets. Before long I “fell in love” and moved in with a woman seven years my senior. We used to attend the Unitarian church on Sunday mornings. She was open-minded and I just wanted to be with her. I found the church dull, but not offensive to me as a Jew, since there were no real and absolute statements made about God or other religions.

Then, one Sunday afternoon in February, a group of four well-dressed men approached me on Peachtree Street in Atlanta. They looked foreign with their crewcuts and their white shirts and thin ties. It was 1971 and I was a classic hippie with long hair and beads, no shoes and tie-dye T-shirt. These men were aliens to me. And their message was just as alien.

They used the expression “turn or burn” as they told me that if I didn’t accept Jesus, I would go to hell. I told them that I was Jewish and their religion made no sense to me. I wanted no part of their message. Their words conjured up images of burning bodies during the Holocaust and of White Supremacists burning crosses on the lawns of Jews and Blacks.
I was angry at these men. In fact, I hated them.

It wasn’t that I objected to Jesus. I didn’t know enough about him to object or not. But I hated people telling me that I needed their religion—that mine was somehow not good enough.

I responded to these four men fiercely, yelling at them, saying that they knew nothing about Jewish people or our problems! Who were they to tell me to join them in eternity—they wanted to convert me to their gentile god? What rubbish! Quit being a Jew? I don’t think so. I was loud and raging. I think they got the point. I felt perfectly righteous in my response. Yet other things had pointed out to me that I was in no way righteous.

For example, before going to Atlanta, I spent some time in New Orleans, Louisiana. There, I saw myself for what I was one morning on Bourbon Street. It was about 3 A.M. I had spent the day lying in Jackson Square Park outside of the Catholic cathedral. Occasionally, I picked up my 12-string guitar and strummed popular tunes like “Suite: Judy Blue Eyes” from Crosby Stills and Nash and “Knights in White Satin” from the Moody Blues. Crowds gathered and sang along. It was like a Southern love-in. What a time! That night, a group of us began to dance on the streets outside a jazz-filled nightclub. We were all in a chain, dancing our way down the narrow street weaving our way through the tourists and the hawkers. I felt so full of peace and love and happiness. Then I looked to my right and saw a man standing next to me—and I despised him. It was unreasonable. I didn’t know him, except to observe that his skin was a different color than mine, he was missing a pair of front teeth and he was sweaty. I was ashamed of how I felt. Here I was, supposedly a man of peace and love, yet I didn’t love this man. I knew it was wrong but I had no control over my feelings. I simply hated him. I knew that he didn’t deserve it—and I knew that I was a hypocrite.

Two weeks later, I was newly arrived in Atlanta and looking for a place to sleep. I heard about a crash pad and I went to stay there. While a fellow traveler was in the showers cleaning up from his day, I rifled his trousers looking for cash. Sure enough, I found $5 and took it, pocketing it while no one looked. The guilt was horrible inside me, but what was I to do? I was hungry; I had been panhandling, begging, and here was an easy five-spot. I knew that it was wrong, but again I felt unable to do otherwise. Where could I turn? I went to Washington D.C. and marched for peace, but I knew . . . I was not truly a man of peace. I was a person who could hate people I didn’t know. I was a person who could steal.

I visited my sister in Miami (pictured) and had some significant albeit seedy encounters there during my stay.

Within the year, I returned to Kansas. I had taken a beating, mentally and emotionally. I had not found the answers I thought would be forthcoming from my wandering hippie lifestyle. My father bought me a one-way ticket from Washington D.C. so that I could celebrate Passover with the family.

We began the seder but when we started to read the Haggadah I interrupted. “Are we going to do the same thing that we do every year?” No one was prepared for that. “What do you mean?” they wanted to know.

“It’s just that every year we say the same words—but do we know what we are saying? Can’t we just talk through the seder tonight?” I asked. My mother was very keen to see some changes anyway, so she stood up and said, “I have an idea. Let’s have Robert lead the seder tonight!” Normally my parents (and most others) call me Bob. “Robert” was used only if I was in trouble or about to be honored. I didn’t know if I was in trouble or not, but my father agreed to my mother’s proposal. We began to celebrate the seder and to interpret the exodus from Egypt in light of the civil rights movement and the need for all people to be free. We followed the Haggadah loosely, but we didn’t rely on the text as we moved through the celebration.
We reached the part of the Haggadah that reads, “Let us sing unto the Lord a new song, praise ye the Lord, Hallelujah.”
“What song do we sing now?” my mother wanted to know. I was well aware of the melody and the words we would traditionally sing at that point, but instead, I suggested, “Let’s really sing a new song.” My sister Judy and cousin Janet began to sing a popular rock and roll song about Jeremiah (not the prophet, but the bullfrog) by a group called “Three Dog Night.” The song, (“Joy to the World”) was a fun song for teens, but it had nothing to do with the exodus or the spirit of the evening. I said, “No, let’s sing something else.” However, my sister and cousin—enamored with the freedom of the evening—continued to sing. My other cousin, Nancy, and I began singing “Hallelujah,” the chorus from Handel’s “Messiah.”

Imagine the cacophony! Bullfrogs and omnipotence! One grandmother wondered loudly what was going on while the other yelled at my mother to make us stop. When the noise level rose to the breaking point my father yelled, “Shah!” The room was hushed. Everyone looked at my father. He picked up the Haggadah and began to read at the point we had stopped. I pushed back from the table, announcing, “That was my fourth cup,” and left.

Outside I wondered, “What do I do now?” No one ever left the seder early. At least not in my household. The moon was full. I looked up to heaven. I’d rarely spoken to God in English before. Not much beyond, “Now I lay me down to sleep,” when I was a young boy. That night was different. I looked up and said, “Sir. Here I am, trying to bring meaning and relevance to the seder. I’m trying to make it ours. But those people in there (my family) are hypocrites. They don’t even believe in you (that was actually not true) and they don’t care about anything but getting to page 28 (when we eat). Here I am, trying to do it right and they are still in there going through the motions. Is there another way?” I had more to say, but that was the gist of my prayer. Is there another way?

As I was trying to fit the pieces of my life back together, I met a woman named Marva who was doing the same. Marva had been raised in a Christian home but had recently had some kind of personal and intense experience with Jesus. She wanted to tell me about it. Since her thoughts about Jesus included thoughts about me, I tolerated what she had to say.

A month later, I was walking in Kansas City near the Volker Park, home of the Nelson Art Gallery. It is a pristine site in the historic Country Club Plaza. In 1971, it was a gathering place for hippies who congregated there each Sunday afternoon, listening to rock music and tossing Frisbees.

As I passed two young people, they cried out, “Do you know the Lord is with you?” Oy, I thought. More of those “Jesus people.” Like the ones in Atlanta. But strangely, I stopped, asking myself, “Why do I always walk past those people?” I turned around and walked back to them with a challenge. “I’m Jewish; go ahead.” I knew they wanted to convert me to their blond-haired, blue-eyed god. I’d seen the movies.

Pam and John flipped open their Bibles and began telling me about Jesus right out of the book. They answered some of my questions but were stumped by others. When I asked them about peace on the earth, they answered that they had peace. Personally! They said that when I accepted Jesus, the sky would be bluer and the grass would be greener! Their experience of Christianity was alive and they wanted me to experience it, too. This was so different from my experience in Atlanta. These enthusiastic people had something that they wanted to share with me. And since (unlike Marva), I had no particular interest in them personally, I found myself curious about what they were saying.

Still, I was Jewish and it was my duty to refute these nice people and their nice religion. It was not new for me to discuss religion in this way. Jimmy, the baal teshuva from summer camp had given me a book. The title was something like Missionaries at the Door, and it provided responses to those who might try to convert Jews to Christianity. I had read that book. John and Pam were out of their league and I won the Bible battle. But they won a bigger battle, and so I continued thinking about Jesus.

They won me with their humility. They admitted they did not have all the answers. I’d never heard of religious people not having all the answers—or at least openly admitting they didn’t. Every religious person I’d ever met seemed fairly confident in his or her own ability to answer any objection and query. Here were two Christians, ministers I thought, who admitted what they didn’t know. Nor did they seem flustered or upset to have to do so. That was very refreshing. Their confidence in the answers they did offer was not based on who they were, but in the One of whom they spoke.

They pointed me to the Source. They urged me to go talk to God and to ask him for answers that they could not provide. That was new. If you wanted to know anything in Orthodox Judaism, you would go to the Talmud or to a rabbi. You would read a book. Ask God? Not likely! He was too busy. And besides, I wasn’t altogether sure that he cared about me. Well, these people were absolutely convinced that he did, and that I should be in touch with him about Jesus.

After that encounter, I wanted to talk to Marva again. Whatever interest I may have had in her was eclipsed by the challenge I had decided to take: to find out about Jesus for myself.

It was Friday. We stayed up that entire night reading from the New Testament. We began in the first book, the Gospel of Matthew, and kept reading. We even read parts of the book of the Revelation. How exciting—and a bit scary—to read that apocalyptic book at night!
The part that spoke to me the most was in John, chapter 10. There, Jesus encountered some religious leaders in Jerusalem. He claimed to be the Messiah and equal with God. They picked up stones to stone him and he declared, “For which of my works do you stone me?” That was a stunning statement. I’d read philosophy and anticipated that Jesus the philosopher would say, “For which of my words do you stone me?” But this wasn’t a typographical error. This was a religious man, standing in front of other religious leaders, saying something like, “If I’ve done anything wrong, go ahead and kill me.” Wow! Imagine inviting religious people to scrutinize you. It’s like asking your mother to tell you if you have any dirt on your trousers after playing outside in the mud. Of course, they’ll find the sins.
Now I knew a little something about being inspected by religious leaders. When I was about 14, my mother had knitted a beautiful white sweater with interwoven blue and red cable stitching. How proud I was to wear it to the synagogue one Shabbat. During the course of the service, the rabbi called me to the front and chided me for not dressing suitably (meaning I should have worn a jacket and not a sweater). For added emphasis, he slapped my cheek. Now this was probably not at all typical of most rabbis, but it was my experience and so this is how I thought of religious authorities. How could Jesus have stood in front of such people to invite them to find fault. Even more amazing, these leaders could not find a thing wrong with Jesus!

The person of Jesus was very appealing. The New Testament was a defensible book; the gospel was a defensible story. As I found myself drawn to Jesus I began asking myself, how could I do this? How could I be Jewish and believe in Jesus? It seemed like such a paradox. My upbringing told me that the beliefs that were making so much sense to me were off-limits for a Jew. But what I was reading and what I was sensing from having asked God was this: If Jesus was the Messiah, then the most “right” thing I could do as a Jew, and as a person seeking truth, was to believe. I knew what the consequences would be and did not relish them. It would hurt my family. I would be an outcast. Believing and following Jesus would have a serious impact on my dating life and in fact, on my entire social situation. But, I concluded, if it’s the Truth, then that’s what I want more than anything. And I continued to read.
My father came into my room on Sunday and saw me pouring over the Bible that Marva had lent me. (I’d hardly stopped reading since Friday night.) “Whose Bible is this?” he asked as he removed it from my hands. “God’s,” I whispered rather loudly but with a sense of awe. He stormed out of my room, Bible in hand, and tossed it in the kitchen trash. I later retrieved it.

On Monday night, I went to Marva’s house. I had concluded from my reading that I did not need “meaning and relevance.” I needed and longed for forgiveness.

It was May 1971. I sat on the step of Marva’s front porch and prayed with her. I asked God to forgive me, to consider Jesus’ atoning death the covering for my sins, to give me a new life. And he did.
I felt an immediate change. I guess it was noticeable because Marva, who wouldn’t let me hug her before (she knew my state!) now welcomed me as a brother in Messiah, a fellow disciple. She taught me the song “Amazing Grace” that night. I’d heard Judy Collins sing it before, but didn’t understand a thing until that night. It was a joy to sing about grace after truly experiencing it.
That Monday night, I went back to my parents’ house in Prairie Village, Kansas and told them of my new faith. They thought I was crazy. How could a Jew be a Christian? I assured them that my decision was real, that it was based on Truth. My parents were good people and, in their way, they were very committed Jews; they wanted to do the right thing. My father felt that I should leave the house immediately. My mother convinced him to allow me to spend the night. I went to bed with a sense of real sadness, yet in some inexplicable way, I still had joy in my heart.

I awoke to the sound of yelling. My parents didn’t know what to do with me; I didn’t know what to do with them. The best solution was for me to move out, which I did that morning. I got a new apartment on Charlotte Street in Kansas City, a new job at Winstead’s (an upscale “burger joint”), and most important, I got a new life and a new perspective.

I began to measure reality in terms of God rather than my own self-actualization. Jesus provided the atonement I needed to know God, to relate to him. God was still “other” but he had reached out to his creation—to me—through his Messiah, Jesus.

Before believing in Jesus, I was discouraged that I could never measure up. I felt condemned by each and every failure—not because someone was actively chastising me, but because I didn’t see any biblical provision of forgiveness for breaking the many rules and regulations.
After Jesus, I was still very much aware of my imperfections, but even more aware of his perfections. He could do what I couldn’t—make it through this life without mistakes. He knew the difference between pleasing God and pleasing people. And his ability to please God perfectly—and to die in place of those who deserved God’s condemnation—provided atonement, covering for my sin and for anyone else who would claim it. Now that didn’t mean I was free to live a life of immorality or hypocrisy, or that I didn’t need to concern myself with pleasing God. It meant that I wanted, more than ever, to please this God of forgiveness, this God of love. I could trust him to guide me and when I fell, I could trust him to pick me up.

I didn’t run out to become a missionary. But I did begin to preach on the streets immediately, since I wanted others to have this life-saving experience. I went to bars to tell people about Jesus and to Bible studies and churches to learn more about him. I listened to Bible teaching tapes and went to conferences about Jesus. I played songs about Jesus on my 12-string guitar anywhere and everywhere I could. I truly felt compelled to proclaim God’s good love in Jesus.

After about four months, I stuck out my thumb and went hitchhiking again—mostly around Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma and eventually Wichita and Lawrence, Kansas. There I met Steve Churchill, a believer in Jesus who became like a brother to me. We began to pray and ask God how we could serve him in Lawrence.

Patty as university freshman in 1975
Steve and I started a church called “The Mustard Seed,” a meaningful name to me because Jesus said that is as much faith as we need—the size of a mustard seed. I had learned from experience what God can do with a tiny speck of faith. That’s all I had when I realized that if Jesus was true, I wanted to believe. The Mustard Seed church began as a small group of people who wanted to study the Bible together . . . and eventually grew to a community of about 700 people. In fact, over the last 40 years thousands of people have joined in the community there; I've been privileged to be part of it for many decades.

I was teaching and pastoring (we didn’t use that term . . . it sounded too institutional) when I met Patty, a university freshman who began attending The Mustard Seed. It was 1974. We married in 1977.

Mr Mendelsohn, school teacher
The church was growing by leaps and bounds when I stepped down from my position. I wanted to devote more of myself to finishing university, to my wife and also to my job.

I graduated from the University of Kansas with a Bachelor of Science degree in Education and became a high school mathematics teacher in Basehor, Kansas. I got along well with the students and truly enjoyed my job. I had hoped that this was to be my calling. But there was something else.

I just had to tell people about Jesus—from the very beginning. And so it was inevitable that I would eventually become associated with a group of people who just had to do the same.

I first encountered Jews for Jesus in May of 1973, when their Jewish gospel music group, “The Liberated Wailing Wall”, came through Lawrence, Kansas. After meeting them I went out immediately and got a T-shirt made that said, “Jews for Jesus.” I liked the way they identified themselves up front. Eight months later, I traveled to California to visit several organizations, including Jews for Jesus.
Moishe Rosen, the founder of Jews for Jesus, was in the office when I came and he invited me to lunch. As we sat in a Chinese restaurant, he asked me something to the effect of, “What can you do to help Jews for Jesus?” I thought it was a pretty good organization and it hadn’t occurred to me that I had anything to add. Yet that question riveted me. What can I do to help people find what Jesus offers? How can I use the talents God has given me to serve him today?

I felt a tug, but I had a plan for my life—which at that time did not include being a missionary. Over the next few years, different people from Jews for Jesus came through the Lawrence area. They generally encouraged me in my efforts to serve God, and usually invited me to join their efforts too.

Finally in 1978, when I was leading a rather predictable and respectable life as a math teacher, another staff member from Jews for Jesus passed through the area. We met and he urged me to consider investing my life as an evangelist. I knew how difficult it had been for me to consider Jesus. Here was an opportunity to spend my life speaking to my own people about a matter of life and death. For the first time, I said I would talk to God about it.

A couple of months passed and I could not shake the idea. Moishe’s question was still hanging in the air. I called San Francisco to talk to him. A few months later, in September 1979, Patty and I joined the staff of Jews for Jesus. We’ve lived in San Francisco, Chicago, Washington D.C., New York . . . and in 1998 we packed up and moved with our three children to Sydney, Australia. When you hand over the reins of your life to God you never know where you will end up—but it’s always an adventure!
By way of a postscript, a few words about my Grandma Bessie. She never wanted to have anything to do with the person of Jesus for as long as I could remember. Whenever I would try to broach the subject, she would flick the back of her hand in the air to indicate her disinterest. She refused even to pronounce the name “Jesus.” It was a painful memory to her and so many of our people who sustained hurt, humiliation, rejection and even death from those who named Jesus as their God and motivator.
When Grandma was put in a nursing care facility it had nothing to do with her wits, but rather the frailty of her aging body. One October morning in 1991, I went there for an early visit. Rarely would I bring my Bible to visit her because she had made it so clear, so often, that she was not interested in hearing anything from the Bible. Nevertheless, I brought it in that day.
I began speaking to the charge nurse assigned to Grandma Bessie’s floor. She wanted to know what I did for a living and I told her I worked with Jews for Jesus. She was thrilled, since she, too, was a believer in Jesus. We spoke about eternal things as I approached Grandma’s room.

As soon as I walked in the door, Grandma greeted me with, “What was it you were talking about just now?”

Matter-of-factly I answered, “We were talking about the forgiveness of sins that Jesus offers and the eternal life that he brings.”

“I would like to hear more about that,” she announced. My jaw nearly hit the ground! With surprise and delight, I opened the Bible and began reading to her. I could almost see something going on in her heart and mind as she listened. After 30 minutes of conversation, I asked Grandma, “Would you like to accept God’s forgiveness through Jesus now?” And at the age of 96, she did!

The peace and joy that flooded her soul were evident. Her eyes lit up and her face shone. She continued to shine for five more years, until at the age of 101, she left this earth and went to meet her Messiah face to face.

If you want to know the truth about Jesus, it doesn’t matter if you are young, old or in-between. Please ask God to tell you what is real.




For more current activities and thoughts see his blog, Facebook and twitter:

http://aussie-jewsforjesus.blogspot.com/

http://www.facebook.com/bobmendelsohn

http://twitter.com/JFJAustralAsia

_____________________________________________________________________________________






Glossary
Baal teshuvah: In the past, this phrase was used to describe one who turned away from Judaism, but later returned to embrace it. Now it is more commonly used to refer to any Jewish person who decides to move from a less religious or non–religious lifestyle to one of observing Orthodox Jewish laws and rituals.

Bar mitzvah: Literally “son of the commandment.” This rite of passage at age 13 marks the entrance of a Jewish boy into the Jewish religious community (which for traditional Jews includes observance of the commandments of the Torah). It includes a public reading from the Torah and is often followed by an elaborate celebration.

Bimah: The synagogue platform from which the Torah is read.

Bubbe: Grandmother.

Daven: Means “to pray” in Yiddish. Refers to reciting Jewish prayers, often with a rocking motion. (past tense = “davened”)

Frum: Very religious, observant of Jewish law.

Haggadah: Literally, “the narrative” or “story.” This is the book (or in some cases, condensed booklet) which gives the order of service for the Passover celebration. The Haggadah tells the story of how God brought Israel out from slavery in Egypt. It includes narratives, songs, psalms and other prayers to commemorate freedom and praise the Almighty for his mighty acts of redemption.
Kavanah: Intention, devotion. Refers to a sense of spirituality that is supposed to breathe life into ritual.

Ma’ariv: Evening prayers. The daily service recited at night after sunset.

Minchah: Afternoon prayers. The second service of the day, recited in the afternoon up to sunset.

Mitzvot: plural of mitzvah: command, observance, good deed. A mitzvah may refer to one of the 613 commandments, or it may simply refer to any act of kindness.

Musaf: Additional prayers recited on Sabbath, Holidays and Rosh Chodesh (New Moon).

Ruach: Spirit.

Shah!: “Shhhh!” or “Quiet!”

Shabbes goy: A non-Jew employed by a religious Jew to perform tasks on the Sabbath that are prohibited on that day by traditional religious practice—such as turning lights on and off.

Shacharit: Morning prayers. The first service of the day. Its name is derived from the Hebrew word shachar, meaning “dawn” or “daybreak.”

Sh’ma: Passage of Scripture from Deuteronomy 6:4–9. It is chanted as one of the most important of all Jewish prayers and affirms the sovereignty and oneness of God. The recitation in the synagogue also includes Deuteronomy 11:13–21, 15:37–41.

Shul: Synagogue.
Tefillin: Small leather boxes to be strapped on the arm and forehead for prayer, in which are encased Scriptures inscribed on parchment. Two of the Scriptures are from Exodus (13:1-10 and 13:11-16) and the other two are from Deuteronomy (6:4-9 and 11:13-21). The ritual of strapping the tefillin on for prayer is referred to as “laying tefillin,” or “putting on tefillin.” It is done in accordance with the traditional understanding of Exodus 13:9, “And it shall be for a sign upon thy hand and for a frontlet between thine eyes.” The ritual is to be performed by the men each morning, except for Sabbaths and holidays.

Bob’s story is available online at:

jewsforjesus.org/resources/ebooks

05 April 2010

Morocco ....expelling Christians

Look at the news today.

MOROCCO EXPELS FOREIGN CHRISTIANS
Moroccan authorities have deported more than 70 Christian aid workers in a nationwide crackdown including the expulsion of those caring for 33 Moroccan orphans. The Moroccan government is believed to be planing to deport more foreign citizens for alleged “proselytizing.” At the Village of Hope orphanage the government expelled 16 staff workers, 10 foster parents and 13 natural-born dependents from the country, within 24 hours of arriving to undertake an investigation of the orphanage.

New Zealand native Chris Broadbent, who works at Village of Hope, said that the separation of the foster families and the children was traumatic. As much as they hoped to be re-united, he said, that did not seem likely. Broadbent emphasized that government accusations that they had been proselytizing were unfounded..He said. “Right from the start they knew that we were an organization founded by Christians and run by a mixture of Christians and Muslim people working together.” Authorities gave no evidence of how proselytisation was supposed to have occurred..

In the 10 years of operation. Moroccan authorities had never before raised any charges about the care of the children. Another orphanage called Children’s Haven, has also been under investigation and sources believe its 20 staff members will suffer a fate similar to that of Village of Hope. “The action against the Village of Hope is seen as part of a nationwide crackdown against Christians living in Morocco. Local Christians are becoming concerned that the wave of intolerance may spread to the country’s small but growing church of nearly 1,000 believers.

Communications Minister Khalid Naciri said the government would be “severe with all those who play with religious values.” He denied the tougher line against non-Muslims was a step backward in terms of religious freedom. “Morocco will remain a land of openness and tolerance,” he said. Experts believe that attacks on the church are inevitable as the church grows and becomes more visible. “The government is under pressure from Islamists to curb the growth of Christianity and it cannot afford to be seen to be doing nothing about the problem,” said one expert.

Morocco’s accusations of “proselytization” by foreign aid workers apparently contradict its pledge to allow freedom of religion. It has affirmed the right to manifest one’s faith in worship, observance, practice or teaching. It has also said however that “freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject to limitations to protect public safety, order, health, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.” Last year a Moroccan government spokesman asserted that freedom of religion does not include freedom to choose one's faith by converting to another religion.”

Source: Intercessors Network

Wow, can you imagine if America or Australia went into a mosque and began collecting the leaders, the teachers, the enthusiasts and poured them into a police wagon, out to the airport, and sent them away to Morocco? Where is the UN at times like this? What a mockery of government freedoms.

All that said, we who believe in our religion enough to proclaim it need to be aware that extended freedoms can be withdrawn in a heartbeat. Don't count on any government to provide you freedom or to give to you. Trust in the Lord with all your heart, the Proverbs says. Don't lean on your own understanding. "Don't lean" means, don't even incline yourself to trust human understanding. If you think it's automatic, be advised, someone who extends to you a favour can withdraw it just as quickly. Only God is to be trusted completely.

And if they deport you or me, then we will have to preach somewhere else. And maybe that's how God gets us from one place to another. So be it. So we trust Him.

03 April 2010

Three Wooden Crosses

Continuing my new pattern of covering a favorite song, I’m thinking today, on Friday of Passover, Good Friday, about three wooden crosses. This is the title of the song by Randy Travis. I find the words personal, and deeply meaningful.



The text follows:

It’s the story of four folks (a farmer and a teacher, a hooker and a preacher) travelling in a bus to Mexico, when suddenly there is a crash and blood and pain is everywhere. The chorus tells us,
“There are three wooden crosses on the right side of the highway,
Why there’s not four of them, heaven only knows.
‘Cause it’s not what you take when you leave this world behind you,
It’s what you leave behind you when you go.”

So everyone crashes out and four are dying. But the preacher lays that ‘blood-stained Bible in the hooker’s hand’

It’s a good twist/turn of a tale. And makes me think about what I’m leaving in the hands and the hearts of others. Will I give Bibles? Will I leave faith in the hearts of my followers? Will anyone listen to what I have to say?

So, what are you leaving behind? What does the story of those three wooden crosses compel you to do today? Or tomorrow? Why not invite folks from your neighbourhood to come to church on Easter on Sunday?

And the picture of three wooden crosses, like this one pictured on the highway in Kansas I took last month, is another similar statement about the ‘original’ Three Crosses. See below for Christian Courier’s take on the crosses.



Three Wooden Crosses
by Randy Travis

A farmer and a teacher, a hooker and a preacher,
Ridin' on a midnight bus bound for Mexico.
One's headed for vacation, one for higher education,
And two of them were searchin' for lost souls.
That driver never ever saw the stop sign.
And eighteen wheelers can't stop on a dime.

There are three wooden crosses on the right side of the highway,
Why there's not four of them, Heaven only knows.
I guess it's not what you take when you leave this world behind you,
It's what you leave behind you when you go.

That farmer left a harvest, a home and eighty acres,
The faith and love for growin' things in his young son's heart.
And that teacher left her wisdom in the minds of lots of children:
Did her best to give 'em all a better start.
And that preacher whispered: "Can't you see the Promised Land?"
As he laid his blood-stained bible in that hooker's hand.

There are three wooden crosses on the right side of the highway,
Why there's not four of them, Heaven only knows.
I guess it's not what you take when you leave this world behind you,
It's what you leave behind you when you go.

That's the story that our preacher told last Sunday.
As he held that blood-stained bible up
For all of us to see.
He said: "Bless the farmer, and the teacher, and the preacher;
"Who gave this Bible to my mamma,
Who read it to me."

There are three wooden crosses on the right side of the highway,
Why there's not four of them, now I guess we know.
It's not what you take when you leave this world behind you,
It's what you leave behind you when you go.

There are three wooden crosses on the right side of the highway.


A Reflection Upon Three “Crosses”
By Wayne Jackson
(http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/1383-a-reflection-upon-three-crosses)

Crucifixion was probably the most horrible form of capital punishment ever devised by man. The ancient Persians practiced it (ca. 522 B.C.); for example, when Darius, a Persian ruler, conquered Babylon (the second conquest), he had three thousand leading citizens crucified (Herodotus, The Histories 3.159). Later crucifixion became a mode of Greek execution. Following the destruction of Tyre, Alexander the Great crucified two thousand men of military age (Rollin 1857, 526).

On occasion, the Jews resorted to crucifixion. In the inter-biblical period, Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 B.C.) crucified eight hundred Pharisees who had been involved in a revolt. The Romans, however, were most noted for the practice. In 71 B.C., following a slave revolt in Rome, six thousand recaptured slaves were crucified on the Appian Way leading to the city (Vos 1999, 439).

The verb “crucify” (forty-six times in the New Testament) was used by the inspired writers of the New Testament to depict the mode of Jesus’ death. But not his only—two other men were crucified at the same time as Christ. All four Gospel writers are emphatic that two criminals were crucified—one on either side of the Savior (Matthew 27:38; Mark 15:27; Luke 23:32; John 19:18). These two additional victims are identified as “robbers” or “malefactors” (kakourgos—an “evil worker,” cf. 2 Timothy 2:9). This fourfold testimony emphasizes the importance of understanding the full picture of this historical situation.
Prophecy

Several prophets indicated the manner of Christ’s death. David spoke of the Messiah’s “hands and feet” being “pierced” (Psalm 22:16). Isaiah announced that he would be “wounded” for our transgressions (53:5). Zechariah told of a day of grace when many within the Hebrew family would mourn over him whom they had “pierced.” He further added that in “that day” a “fountain” would be opened for “sin and uncleanness” (12:11ff; 13:1).

In addition, there were subtle prophetic hints that Jesus’ death would be cast into the mold of a criminal. This thought is implied when the prophet foretold that the “grave” of Jehovah’s “servant” would be “with the wicked,” and that he would be “numbered with transgressors” (Isaiah 53:9,12). Jesus specifically declared this latter prophecy was to be “fulfilled” ultimately in him (Luke 22:37).

It is important, therefore, for the Bible student to not only look at the circumstances pertaining to the Lord’s death, but likewise to the details of the two crucified men that died on the same occasion. There are valuable lessons to be learned from all three deaths.
The Cross of a Savior

Three times in the New Testament reference is made to the “cross of Christ” (1 Corinthians 1:17; Galatians 6:12; Philippians 3:18). In this brief article, we will address several theological ideas associated with that “cross,” as that term is used metaphorically to represent the death of Christ portrayed in the gospel message (cf. 1 Corinthians 1:18; Galatians 5:11).
A Cross of Love

The cross of Christ was a cross of love. Early in his ministry Jesus declared: “And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up” (John 3:14; cf. 12:32-33). He then affirmed: “For [an explanation to follow] God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son” (John 3:16). Clearly, the conclusion to be drawn is that the “cross” was a manifestation of God’s love for lost humanity.

Similarly, John later would record these words: “Unto him who loves us, and loosed us from our sins by his blood” (Revelation 1:5). The cross was an emblem of the unfathomable love of God, and likewise that of his beloved Son.
A Cross of Sacrifice

The cross of Christ was a cross of sacrifice. Paul reminded the saints in Ephesus that Christ loved them, and the expression of that love was that he “gave himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for an odor and a sweet smell” (Ephesians 5:2).

Reflect upon the fact that Jesus, by virtue of the incarnation (John 1:18), which ultimately was in view of his destined appointment with the cross, sacrificed:

* his heavenly relationship with God for a third of a century (John 6:38);
* his “equality” with the Father in terms of their respective roles, which involved “the death of the cross” (Philippians 2:6,8);
* his immunity to temptation (cf. James 1:13; Hebrews 4:15);
* his biological life as an atoning offering for sin (2 Corinthians 5:21).

A Cross of Peace

The cross of Christ was a cross of peace. Jesus was able to implement a plan of reconciliation by which sinful humanity could be at peace with the holy God, from whom sin had demanded a separation (Isaiah 59:1-2; Romans 5:1ff; Ephesians 2:1ff). This he accomplished “through the blood of his cross” (Colossians 1:19-20). Also, by his death the Lord was able to break down the “middle wall of partition” that had kept Jew and Gentile estranged. Peace was provided for both segments of humanity, so that “in Christ” no longer is there Jew or Greek; Christians become “one” in him (Ephesians 2:13-18; Galatians 3:28).
A Cross of Joy

The cross of Christ was a cross of joy. The writer of the book of Hebrews sought to encourage his Christian Jewish kinsmen to remain faithful to the Lord, and to “run with patience” the race before them. The prime incentive for such persistence is to look to Jesus as the perfect model of fidelity. In considering the Savior’s determination to implement the plan of salvation, the writer states that the “author and perfecter of faith,” for “the joy that was set before him, endured the cross, despising shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Hebrews 12:2). It is very difficult to think of “joy,” and the “cross,” at the same time, but there it is—in all its majesty. The Savior’s joy over the potential salvation of the human family eclipsed the shame of the cross!
The Cross of a Hardened Villain

As noted earlier, two robbers were crucified in the company of Jesus. Initially, both men “railed on” (blasphemeo) the Lord (Matthew 27:39,44). Joining the chorus of passersby, together with the chief priests, scribes, and elders, the robbers endorsed the vicious chant:

He saved others; himself he cannot save. He is the King of Israel; let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe on him. He trusts God; let him deliver him how, if he desires him: for he said, “I am the Son of God” (Matthew 27:42-43).

The apostle adds: “And the robbers also that were crucified with him cast upon him the same reproach” (v. 44).

As we presently learn, one of these evil men later would reverse his blasphemous disposition; for now, however, we will focus upon the one who did not. There are several conclusions one may reasonably draw regarding this heinous specimen of self-endowed depravity.

1. He had no fear of God (cf. Romans 3:10-18), no respect for divine law, no sense of sacred justice, and no consciousness of the eternal state into which he was poised to enter. He appears to have been void of moral and religious sensitivity. What a fool he was. He was possessed of a blighted, hardened soul that not even the discipline of a horrible crucifixion could awaken.
2. Since he endorsed the sentiments expressed in Matthew 27:42-43 (see above), one can only surmise, therefore, that he had at least some threshold knowledge regarding Christ—his marvelous deeds, and his teaching. For example, when the Lord’s adversaries exclaimed, “he saved others,” it was an inadvertent concession (even though sarcastic) that he had “delivered” others (i.e., by his miracles; cf. John 11:47), but now he could do nothing for himself. It seems almost certain that this rogue, like so many others, had hardened his own heart in disbelief (cf. John 12:37-40).
3. He unequivocally rejected Christ as “King,” and apparently despised him since he endorsed the taunts hurled at the Savior at the height of his agony. Too, he repudiated Jesus’ claim of being the “Son of God.” He was willing to step into the horrible darkness of eternal condemnation with a heart of skeptical hate. Legions follow him with like animosity as the generations come and go.

Many share the same hostility, and no level of conscience-pain or danger can awaken a sense of need in their blighted souls. Pity such wretched creatures!
The Cross of a Penitent Soul

The story of the penitent robber is well known, and elsewhere we have dealt with it in considerable detail (see What About the Thief on the Cross?). We would encourage the reader to review that material rather than rehearsing it here. We will, however, capsulate it ever so briefly. The significant text is found in Luke 23:40-43.

But the other answered, and rebuking him said, “Do you not even fear God, seeing you are in the same condemnation? And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds: but this man has done nothing amiss.” And he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come in your kingdom.” And he said unto him, “Truly I say unto you, today you shall be with me in Paradise.”

The adversative particle “but” (de) emphasizes a contrast between this man and the criminal just discussed (cf. Thayer 1958, 125). Additionally, the word “other,” in describing the penitent robber, is heteros. This is a term that frequently makes a distinction, not just in individuals, but also in “kind” (cf. 23:32; see Thayer 1958, 29; Trench 1890, 359). It may contrast the callousness in the villain, with that of a residual honesty extant in the heart of the “other,” i.e., the contrite robber.

As to what precipitated the radical change in the sorrowful robber, the record is silent. One can only speculate, and we do so with restraint. Surely the character observed in Jesus contributed to the shift in temperament—for instance the Lord’s prayer for his enemies (23:34). This robber may have had some lingering knowledge of Christ from previous associations, which now was ignited into faith (or perhaps even a renewed faith). A careful examination of his statements reveals a number of inferences that hint of previous knowledge. As one scholar carefully observes, the grieving robber “exercises astounding insight into the status and identity of Jesus” (Green 1997, 822).

The reaction of Christ to this sincere man was a vivid commentary on him who knows the hearts of people (cf. Acts 1:24). That the man was pardoned is scarcely open to dispute (v. 43).

This case may never be employed legitimately in an effort to negate the New Covenant obligation to obey the full complement of gospel conditions for salvation (including baptism for the remission of sins).

Until the New Will was probated, men could not be held accountable for its conditions. While the Testator, Christ, still lived among men, He could grant salvation as he would [cf. Mark 2:5]. After his death for our sins, it is granted according to the terms of the will (Foster 1971, 1278; cf. Hebrews 9:15-17). That new “will” mandates: “He who believes and is immersed shall be saved” (Mark 16:16).

Conclusion

Three crosses—and riveting data connected with each. One victim was God incarnate, the Savior; the others—ordinary men. One of these was a resolute renegade; the other, a confessed sinner who surrendered as a disciple. Of these latter two, with which do we identify more closely in disposition?
Sources/Footnotes

* Foster, R.C. 1971. Studies in the Life of Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
* Green, Joel. 1997. The Gospel of Luke – The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
* Rollin, Charles. 1857. Ancient History. Vol. 1. New York, NY: Harper & Bros.
* Thayer, J.H. 1958. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. Edinburgh, Scotland: T.&T. Clark.
* Trench, R.C. 1890. Synonyms of the New Testament. London, England: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, & Co.
* Vos, Howard. 1999. New Illustrated Bible Manners & Customs. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

01 April 2010

Jesus, Take the wheel



Songwriter Brett James talks about Carrie Underwood's seven-week No. 1 song, 'Jesus, Take the Wheel,' which he co-wrote with Gordie Sampson and Hillary Lindsey.

That day started out to be a typical "day at the office." We wrote it at Hillary's house. We were trying to think of ideas, and Gordie walked in and said, "I have this title, and I don't know what to do with it: 'When Jesus Takes the Wheel.'" Hillary and I both laughed. I thought it was kind of silly, to be honest with you. I thought, "What in the world does that mean?" We kind of talked about it a while, then went around with five or six other song titles to write something else. We couldn't think of anything else and went back to Gordie's idea. Sure enough, we started writing it about the girl driving on Christmas Eve with a baby in the backseat of her car. It evolved into 'Jesus, Take the Wheel' soon after that. My wife had a similar experience to the girl in the song. My wife had a car crash when we were dating. She nearly died. Her car spun around several times and went under an 18-wheeler. She said she saw angels come help her.

She walked away with no injuries. I thought it was interesting that she had that same situation happen to her like the girl in the song. It became such a neat song because it touches people. Those songs are really special. We really had no idea who was going to record the song. When Carrie recorded it, it was one of those magical things when you get the right artist and the right song. This happened to be one of those songs. That will always be one of the most special songs to me.

That's how the author of the song describes it.

And maybe you have certain circumstances in your life where things are beyond you. And you need someone to drive. This weekend, this Easter weekend, when you ponder this, why not let Jesus, the Lord of life, lead you? Let him rule over you and guide you well. He's the Saviour and author of life. He knows how to drive. He wants to take your wheel. Won't you let him?